A Tornado Saves Washington during the War of 1812

A burnt-out White House, August 1814.

The War of 1812 was a bizarre episode in U.S. History. Both nations went into the war with few clear objectives. Neither were prepared. The campaigns are a litany of tragic, botched efforts resulting in pointless bloodshed. And in the end, everything returning to status quo ante bellum, that is, as they were prior to the war.

It begs the question, “Why did we fight?” That large topic is not the subject of this post. I’ll simply say (and perhaps will go more in depth on the matter in a future post) that the war had more to do with western territory than anything else, setting up a pattern for all U.S. wars in the 19th century. It irks me when historians focus on the issue of sovereignty on the high seas and refer the War of 1812 as the “Second War of Independence.” We had our independence. Our independence was not incomplete nor was it in jeopardy. If shipping rights were the issue then why did the land campaigns focus almost exclusively on our western frontier?…But, I digress.

Back to the tornado. A curious story and almost eerie in its timing.

By the summer of 1814, two years into the war, the United States was in trouble. There had been numerous bungled attempts to invade Canada (the objective seemingly to occupy what is now eastern Ontario…though I’m not sure that objective was ever really understood or articulated by American leaders). There had been a successful campaign under Major General William Henry Harrison in Canada, but unfortunately the War Department refused to fully support it. Harrison therefore gave his resignation and his success came to nothing.

Things got worse in April 1814. Great Britain, to our advantage, had been fighting two wars at once. But when Napoleon surrendered to the Russians and was exiled to Elba, the Napoleonic Wars had, for the time being, ended. Now Great Britain could devote tens of thousands of battle-hardened veterans to the war against the United States. Thus far, we had been fighting demoralized British troops stationed in Upper Canada, many of them eager to desert. Now, grizzled men who had served under Wellington and fought against Napoleon would be invading our shores. This was a very different type of soldier. With this influx of veterans, Great Britain would finally go on the offensive.

One of the first targets in August 1814 was primarily a psychological one. Many British officers were pushing for the burning of Washington D.C. There were certainly more important strategic objectives. But there was a desire to avenge the plundering that Americans had committed in York (now Toronto) and strike a massive blow to American morale.

Landing in Benedict, Maryland on August 19, 1814, a British force of roughly 5,000 men marched towards Washington. An American force of roughly 7,000 led by Brigadier General William Winder made a largely pathetic attempt to stop the British at the Battle of Bladensburg, Maryland on August 24. I hesitate to use that word because there was some courageous fighting there on the part of some Americans. But the battle was so poorly planned, the American forces so confused, it turned into an awful rout very quickly. And the road to Washington lay wide open to the British.

Once in Washington, the British burned the White House (after sitting down to eat a large feast that Dolly Madison and her staff had prepared for cabinet members before they were all forced to flee). The War Department, the State Department, the Treasury department and many other government offices were burned. And, of course, the Capitol building, with the original Library of Congress, was destroyed.

The policy was to leave private property alone. However, the conflagration of many public buildings threatened to spread out of control. The city was in jeopardy.

The next day, August 25, as fires still raged, a massive storm hit Washington. The driving rain put out most of the fires threatening the city. Perhaps more important, the invading British were so battered and demoralized, the storm played a large role in the decision to cut short the occupation of Washington.

The storm was so fierce that it tore buildings apart, literally lifting them off their foundations. The winds uprooted trees and knocked men to the ground. A number of houses collapsed, killing the British soldiers taking shelter therein. One British officer reported seeing cannons lifted off the ground and thrown through the air. Redcoats out on the streets of Washington, trying to enforce a curfew, were forced to lie prostrate in the mud.

Based on the first hand accounts, weather historians generally agree that the storm that struck Washington on August 25, 1814 sparked one or more tornadoes. I can’t possibly imagine being one of these soldiers, completely exposed, with no choice but to cling to mother earth in the midst of a tornado.

As the storm began to subside, one of the British officers in command of the invasion emerged from his shelter and said to one of the inhabitants of Washington, “Great God, Madam, is this the kind of storm to which you are accustomed in this infernal country?!”

She responded, “No, sir, this is a special interposition of Providence to drive our enemies from the city.”

I don’t know about Providence. But there can be no doubt that the tornado that struck Washington that day did more to save the capital than the United States Army ever did. The fires were largely extinguished. And the British limped back to their ships.

[Sources: A.J. Langguth, Union 1812, (2006), 308-311; Anthony S. Pitch, The Burning of Washington, (2000), 140-142.]

About Patrick Browne

I am the director of a museum, an author, Civil War reenactor, among other things. I specialize in early American History from colonization through the Civil War. View all posts by Patrick Browne

15 responses to “A Tornado Saves Washington during the War of 1812

  • Lisa

    I love the quote from the resident of Washington. Sure sounds like Mother Nature took sides on this one. I really enjoyed this post.

  • J. G. Burdette

    “Madam, is this the kind of storm to which you are accustomed in this infernal country?!”

    Poor man! Must’ve come as a surprise. Very interesting article, thanks for sharing it.

  • T.H. Gray

    I never did understand the War of 1812, and evidently I’m not alone: http://peabodyslament.wordpress.com/2011/09/24/the-war-of-1812-the-movie/

    I’m still amused by the Canadians who refer to our Canadian military maneuvers as “invasions.”

    T.H. Gray

  • Pat

    I knew of the tornado and its effect upon our history, but the quotations you included enriched the story.

  • Paul Rentz

    Great story we heard in Baltimore at Fort McHenry. Thanks for the extra details. PS: In Fort McHenry we saw a uniform of one of the military leaders. It was very small, like what a nine year old could fit in. Would you know which officer that belonged to?

    • Patrick Browne

      I’m glad you liked it, Paul. I’ve actually never been to Fort McHenry…definitely on my list…so I can’t help you with regard to the uniforms. But it’s a common thing about historic clothing. They weren’t that much shorter than we are today, but differences in diet, etc. made them much, much thinner. I look at coats in our own collection and wonder how anyone fit in them.

  • chip clippard

    thanks for your article i saw this on history channel and wanted more info i appreciate your quotes also chip clippard

  • Patrick Browne

    Reblogged this on Historical Digression and commented:

    In honor of the bicentennial of this peculiar episode during the War of 1812, I am re-posting this article I wrote a couple years ago.

  • Michael Totten

    Why did the US seek this fight? Expansionism, pure and simple — into territories occupied by the natives under previous British treaties which the U.S. deemed null and void after the Revolution. At the same time, the Louisiana Purchase removed the pressure from French (Napoleonic) aspirations to empire in North America. The lead-up to the War of 1812 consisted of clashes such as the Battle of Tippecanoe. Harrison was later elected President by leaning heavily on his anti-Indian war record.

  • Anonymous

    Maybe I’m reading a little more into this than there is but I detect a slight dislike for the military and America. I’ll do some indepth research on the war of 1812 because I’m thinking you’re taking things out of context. I’m also betting you’re a democrat.

    • Patrick Browne

      That’s a curious comment. Not sure where the anti-American, anti-military conclusion comes from. Read some of the other articles on this blog and you’ll quickly see I feel very strongly about honoring those who served, and write mostly about those who served in the Civil War. As for politics, I try to stay out of it. 21st century politics anyway. I might be a member of the Liberty Party. Too bad they haven’t had a candidate in over 150 years.

  • yeyeright

    Back in the early 19th century an American invasion was definitely part of the agenda. In fact, the U.S. made three attempts at annexing the British territory during the 1812 war.

    And if you ever visit the Canadian capitol in Ottawa you will hear the tour guide explain why Canadians chose such a northern site for their capitol, which was built just a few years after the War of 1812..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 210 other followers

%d bloggers like this: